The journal

Guides· · 4 min read · By

Why Hiring a Dev Shop and an Ads Agency Separately Costs You Conversion

Nobody owns the conversion rate when one company built the site and another buys the traffic. What falls into the gap, what it costs, and why an olive-oil brand grew 18 times before spending a dirham on ads.

Why Hiring a Dev Shop and an Ads Agency Separately Costs You Conversion

The usual way to build and grow a business online is to hire two companies. A development shop builds the site or the store. A marketing agency runs the ads. Each is good at its half. And between the halves there is a gap that nobody is paid to look at, which is where most of the conversion goes.

This is the argument for one team doing both. It is also our business model, so read it with that in mind, and check it against the numbers at the end.

What falls into the gap

Tracking. The developer ships the site; the tracking is "the agency's job". The agency arrives after launch and finds no purchase event, a duplicate tag, or a thank-you page that does not exist. The first month of ads runs blind, and nobody can say why the numbers look wrong.

Landing pages. The agency needs a page for each campaign. The developer has moved to the next client. The agency builds its own pages on a separate tool, off-brand, slow, with a different analytics setup, and the site you paid for is not the site the traffic sees.

Speed. The agency's clicks land on a page that takes six seconds on a phone. The agency reports a high cost per acquisition; the developer says the site is fine on their laptop. Both are right, and the ad budget is gone.

The feed. Shopping campaigns run from a product feed that depends on how the catalogue was built: titles, images, variants, availability. The feed is a marketing problem caused by a development decision, and neither side owns it.

The loop. Good performance marketing is a loop: the data says the product page is losing people at the size selector, so you change the size selector, and measure. With two vendors, the change is a ticket, a quote and a wait. The loop runs monthly instead of daily, or not at all.

What it costs

Time. Every fix crosses a company boundary. Weeks pass between "we see the problem" and "it is fixed".

Blame. The agency blames the site; the shop blames the traffic; you referee. Nobody owns the conversion rate, because nobody's contract mentions it.

Money. Ads spent on pages that were never going to convert. Landing pages built twice. Tracking rebuilt. A retainer paid for management of a campaign the site could not support.

What one team changes

The people who built the product page are the people reading the campaign data, so the page changes the same week. Tracking is wired at build, because the same people will need it. The feed is designed with the catalogue. The landing page for a campaign is a page on your site, in your design system, built by the people who know it. The loop runs at the speed of one team's calendar, and there is one throat to choke.

The order matters: conversion first, then traffic

Here is the part most founders skip. Oleum Crete sells olive oil from Crete in Dubai. We rebuilt its store from a generic Shopify theme into a custom headless storefront, fixed the shopping experience, the technical search foundations and how the products read to AI search, and put the reviews on the page. Monthly sales grew 18 times in the months that followed, organically, before a dirham went to ads. The case study has the detail.

Two lessons. A store that converts turns every later ad dirham into more customers, so the build is the marketing. And a team that can only buy traffic could not have produced that result, because the result came from changing the product.

When two vendors are fine

Large companies with an in-house owner of the funnel, a product team that ships weekly and a marketing team with its own engineers can run two vendors well, because somebody inside owns the gap. If that is you, hire the best specialist for each half. If you are a founder without that person, the gap is yours, and you did not sign up to fill it.

How to check any agency for this

Ask one question: "When the campaign data says the landing page is the problem, who changes the page, and how long does it take?" A dev shop will say "your marketing agency will tell us". An ads agency will say "we will send the developer a brief". One team says "us, this week". That is the whole difference.

The first call is free. If you already have two vendors and a funnel nobody owns, the written point of view that follows will say where the gap is, whether or not you hire us to close it.

Questions

Is it cheaper to hire one agency for build and marketing?
Usually over a year, yes: no landing pages built twice, no tracking rebuilt, no ad budget spent on pages that could not convert. The upfront price of a build is similar; the difference is the waste that a handover creates and the speed at which a single team fixes what the data finds.
Should I improve the website or run ads first?
Fix conversion first. A store that converts turns every later ad dirham into more customers. Oleum Crete's monthly sales grew 18 times from the storefront rebuild alone, before any paid traffic. Ads amplify what a site already does.
What is the risk of one vendor doing everything?
Dependence on one team, and a team that is mediocre at one half. Mitigate both by owning everything: the code in your repository, the ad accounts in your name, a written handover. Then check the case studies for results on both halves, not just one.
How do I know if my current setup has this gap?
Ask who changes a landing page when the campaign data says it is the problem, and how long it takes. If the answer involves a brief, a quote and a wait between two companies, the gap is open and you are paying for it in ad spend.

Get the next one.

One email when a new case study or guide goes up. No list, no newsletter filler.

No list, no filler. Reply to any entry and we will take you off.

Chat with us